Skip to main content


But First, A Word From Our Sponsor:

Top Comments recognizes the previous day's Top Mojo and strives to promote each day's outstanding comments through nominations made by Kossacks like you. Please send comments (before 9:30pm ET) by email to or by our KosMail message board. Just click on the Spinning Top™ to make a submission. Look for the Spinning Top™ to pop up in diaries posts around Daily Kos.

Make sure that you include the direct link to the comment (the URL), which is available by clicking on that comment's date/time. Please let us know your Daily Kos user name if you use email so we can credit you properly. If you send a writeup with the link, we can include that as well. The diarist poster reserves the right to edit all content.

Please come in. You're invited to make yourself at home! Join us beneath the doodle...

Casimir WHAT? Are you high?

You heard me. The Casimir Effect is one of the most interesting and potentially powerful phenomena known to modern science.

Allow the One True Wiki to explain.. well... let me paraphrase the introduction (it's technical):

An immense amount of latent energy is bound up in every cubic centimeter of space-time in the universe. Most of the cosmological constants - things like this l'il thing here, The Planck Constant, are defined by the interplay of forces, effects and particles that, aside from the most excellent Higgs Irish Setter, I mean, boson (Sorry, my one Mitt Romney joke of the night), are all pretty much locked down.

Yet all that means is we have taken inventory of the Lego blocks of reality...and there are a frackin' whole lot of them, and almost all of them come in multiple flavors that interact with themselves, (even if Rick Santorum thinks it's a sin especially if it's self-interacting dark matter). Sorry, had to get that out of the way as well.

Back to topic. The so-called zero point energy of the cosmos is immense. And it can be tapped simply by pressing two plates really, really close together. (Srsly! You Can Haz Powurz!)

Illustration here of plates interacting with quantum field fluctuations.

The idea is that fluctuations have wavelengths.. and once the plates in question are shorter than the ambient wavelength...weirdness ensues. Specifically, the plates depending on their orientation, either press apart or start pressing together.

The closer they get - and they can get damn close - the more powerful the pressure generated. Keep in mind what you could be pressing against at this point - the expansion of the universe itself.

From the Casimir Effect Wiki article:

Because the strength of the force falls off rapidly with distance, it is only measurable when the distance between the objects is extremely small. On a submicron scale, this force becomes so strong that it becomes the dominant force between uncharged conductors. In fact, at separations of 10 [nanometers]—about 100 times the typical size of an atom—the Casimir effect produces the equivalent of 1 atmosphere of pressure (101.325 kPa), the precise value depending on surface geometry and other factors.
I tossed together a spreadsheet building off of equations on Wiki a few months back. Just today I went surfing and found a very interesting pdf, by two scientists, G. Jordan MacCay and one of my favorite science fiction authors - Robert L. Forward.

The piece in question was published in 2003 - two years after Forward's death of cancer.  It has the interesting title "A Gedanken spacecraft that operates using the quantum vacuum (Dynamic Casimir effect)". In it the two men discuss, well, pretty much every imaginable variation of a Casimir Drive, concluding that, given what they deemed viable best-scenario assumptions, this wasn't going to work. Not anytime soon.

Now, at the scales they work on.. my spreadsheet checked out in terms of the potential energy output: not much. Accelerations on the order of billionths of gees. That's just plain pitiful. (My concept went a different way but more on that later.)

Still... they left the door open a crack. After all, there's a lot we don't know about quantum fluctuations in the electromagnetic field but what we do know is there is a LOT of power to tap. MacCay and Forward tried mainly one way: Vibrating two plates with what, to them, were best-case realistic tolerances to vibration frequencies, to generate unidirectional photon radiation by something they called the "Dynamic Casimir Effect".

The premise was that accelerating a boundary through a vacuum in this fashion would create photons (if I understand it rightly, by forcing some small portion of virtual particles to choose a "real" state). The faster the vibration, the more such photon radiation. (For giggles, the two scientists assumed it all went into modest but useful work propelling the spacecraft.)

This was their best-guess at a realistic proof-of-concept exercise to show that the Casimir Effect could be used to tap vacuum energy. And while they were dissatisfied with the performance but satisfied that they'd shown the principle was sound, even with conventional materials.

Then they launched into some speculation on something that did not exist 10 years ago but exists today Metamaterials.

We are now entering an age where we will be able to customize artificial materials to heretofore impossible physical specs (for example, negatively refractive materials or, taken to extreme, materials that are negatively refractive to not just visible light but hard radiation).

MacCay and Forward speculated that such materials could make a Casimir space drive much more powerful by virtue of handling much higher vibration frequencies - perhaps on the order of thousands or millions of times more durable. More vibrations, more propulsive radiation, compliments of the fabric of space-time itself. In theory, very high accelerations would be possible, even for large payloads.

From where I'm sitting, I'm skeptical physical matter of any kind can bring home the bacon in this respect. Then there is the matter that, ahem, matter has mass. It weighs something. Also, based on the lower range of potential vacuum energy, a LOT of space has to be tapped - first to get the energy, straight up, to run the propulsion array, then another array to manifest reaction mass - in the MacCay/Forward model, photons (which have momentum not mass but, hey, the math works and it's been validated in lab experiments).

Ah, but fear not. MacLay and Forward venture, albeit briefly, into the possibility that the Casimir generator elements could be constructed out of coherent sheets of force or plasma which, in theory, could be tuned up to any vibration frequency. They concede that any manipulation of energy would probably reduce the available vacuum potential energy (some of it would be in essence "assigned" to produce the boundaries used to actuate a Casimir Effect in the first place). But on the other hand it's easier to manipulate energy states than construct physical arrays. The loss of efficiency would be more than made up by gains elsewhere - including the potential to propagate the array to any size up to the limits of available energy.

So, if you could assemble such a toy, physical or energy-based, we go from talking about a concept that could, maybe, get a space probe up to Earth escape velocity in about ten years to a space drive that could punch a large starship up to near-light speed in a very short time.

And that, my friends, would be really, really cool.

Oh, I did say I would tell you my variant.

My approach was to lift off of something Arthur C. Clarke mentions in his Songs of Distant Earth: a quantum ramjet.

For, you see, space is never empty. It's more than a source of vacuum energy but a medium full of supplemental reaction mass - micrometeoroids, interplanetary (and interstellar) dust, hydrogen, supernova-fabricated heavy ions and the occasional piece of space junk. The faster you go, especially close to light speed, the more free reaction mass you have to play with.

Why not use Casimir effect 'jets', very truncated open-ended hourglass shapes, built at nanometer-scale, replicated to very high densities and cast as sheets across large planes of space perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the spacecraft. Most of these structures would be invisible. Close in to the hypothetical projectors of these force-forms, they might resembles sails... or wings, glowing in various plasma colors ... red, purple, orange and gold, like our own Sun's prominences.

There would be two sets of these 'sails' - one to gather energy to support the forms, the other to accelerate whatever reaction mass the ship brought (some would be needed to kick-start the expedition) and whatever it collected as it accelerated - first slowly, then faster and faster until its operating maximum and mass gain from approaching near-light speed tapered off its acceleration.

A single 10-nanometer wide channel, 10 nanometers long, would impart negligible thrust to a 100-ton payload: try roughly 10^-21 meters/second squared.

Populate a 100 meter radius circular shield of such elements, at 50 million elements per square meter, and you'd get a mighty 10^-10 gees oomph. Meh. Not so great still.

We know that smaller channel width gets more juice so lets close the channels to 1 nanometer. That gets us to 10^-9 gees

And let's extend the reaction tracks to, oh, 100 nanometers, so there is more time to accelerate the reaction mass. This is trickier and more energy-intensive so we can't go too crazy with this.. and the more energy is utilized to make the shapes, the less efficient the drive. Let's just say this is the practical maximum for our purposes tonight. Now we're at 10^-8 gees. Still pretty light

So now we have to expand the array - this we can do, to the limits of our ability to propagate energy collection arrays and regulate the accelerator elements. We're already at a 100 meters... but we can go much further. Let's say... 100 kilometers, once we're really cooking.

And at that point you are talking roughly 3% gees acceleration. That's not much weight in once sense.. but in another you might as well be talking about warp drive.

It would take such a ship a matter of hours to go from low Earth orbit to Earth escape velocity. Yes, it would be a slow start and, once you got going, cruising up to near-light speed with tau factors in the thousands (one day onboard ship, a few years back home, a few light years down the road) we would have cosmic sails, wings to take us - well, some of us, anyway - anywhere we could imagine going.

From such ugly cignets as the spacecraft of today, beautiful golden swans will be born.

I think some of us, the youngest, will see the first of these ships take flight.

And that would be something worthy of Top Comments to diary about.

March 22, 2012

Thanks to tonight's Top Comments contributors! Let us hear from YOU
when you find that proficient comment.

From Catte Nappe

Milton333 does a masterful job of outlining why we don't need to take digs at the Santorum's grieving for the baby they lost to miscarriage.

When we take the high road, it galls them even more. Not noble reasons to take the high road... I'll take them though.

The same, from Marko the Werelynx

In a diary about artificial and misplaced outrage aimed at the families of politicians I thought milton333's comment was a much needed reminder that we need to stop judging people on how they handle their lives in private. Even when we find those private details to be disturbing. We should remember that nothing should disturb us more than our own ignorance and intolerance. The "it makes me go 'ew' so it must be wrong" attitude is why we're still discussing 'vajayjays' and 'gay' marriage.

Preach it.

from Killer of Sacred Cows

In this diary-worthy comment, killjoy explains why marriage equality so unhinges the low-information Wrong...

The "low-information Wrong". Classic. :)

from lucky lizard

Everyone, this is bob152. Say, "Hi, Bob!"

The comment is titled "Jail"....

"It's not enough that all our governors end up in jail, now we're importing soon-to-be-jailed governors from out of state?"

It just made me smile....

Me too.

from Wee Mama

Crashing Vor On all the people the Reps have lost.

A comment in the open thread, regarding the event where President Obama signed back to a deaf admirer.

The President making new friends as his rivals make new enemies and lots of them...

March 21, 2012

(excluding Tip Jars and first comments)

Got mik!

  1) I'm suspicious, too... by luckydog — 194
  2) nonsense by Cedwyn — 189
  3) IT'S A GANG! by SethRightmer — 184
  4) It's an intimidation tactic by TheCrank — 184
  5) I cry when I look at his photo, too by starfu — 145
  6) Hmmmm, by gchaucer2 — 113
  7) No, you don't seem to be reading too much by rubyr — 111
  8) My daughter is a 4 year breast cancer survivor by TX Freethinker — 104
  9) To be specific... by markthshark — 93
10) Words are inadequate . . . by FogCityJohn — 91
11) Don't worry about us by Dallasdoc — 90
12) Our society does not value black lives as by Geekesque — 80
13) Agreed by Brian A — 78
14) well, folks can cross to the street if they want.. by luckydog — 77
15) And then there is this....sigh by Diogenes2008 — 76
16) They brought it on themselves by docterry — 74
17) you are completely correct, chauncey. by rexymeteorite — 72
18) Because Ownership is Taking Over the Country. by Gooserock — 68
19) I'm guessing you by gchaucer2 — 68
20) My 87 year old mother is still with her boyfriend by Smoh — 67
21) This is an outrage ..Legalized cold blooded murder by boophus — 67
22) There's no doubt about what's said on... by Meteor Blades — 67
23) Congratulations on finding love! by high uintas — 66
24) Yes and continued to screw up even by Vetwife — 65
25) it's unsettling when you realise that speech by Statusquomustgo — 65
26) More objective observers than I by FishOutofWater — 63
27) Getting Komen's admin expenses out of by JenS — 63
28) Florida is catching a lot of by Vetwife — 63
29) W00T ! by weck — 63
30) And we're standing with you Mally. Nice diary. nt by jennyp — 63

March 21, 2012

Enjoy jotter's wonderful PictureQuilt™ below. Just click on the picture and it will magically take you to the comment that features that photo. Have fun, Kossacks!

Originally posted to Top Comments on Thu Mar 22, 2012 at 07:00 PM PDT.

Also republished by SciTech.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site